Thursday, 23 November 2023

BBC headline claim on October 7 deaths is clear disinformation and a dangerous deception - Part 3

Further exchange with BBC (previous correspondence here and here). 

  

Enquiry now raised to Stage 2 level for consideration by the BBC’s Executive Complaints Unit (ECU). 



From the BBC

22 November 2023 


Dear Mr Hilley,


Ref: CAS-7679120-B1Y1G2-1


Thank you for getting in touch again about BBC News.


The BBC’s Editorial Guidelines refer to due accuracy and due impartiality, which is to say the accuracy and impartiality must be adequate and appropriate to the output, taking account of the subject and nature of the content, the likely audience expectation and any signposting that may influence.


What other media outlets report is a matter for them, but we will monitor developments about the killings as the story unfolds.

 

This concludes Stage 1 of our complaints process. That means we can’t correspond with you further here. If you remain unhappy, you can now contact the BBC’s Executive Complaints Unit (ECU). The ECU is Stage 2 of the BBC’s complaints process. You’ll need to explain why you think there’s a potential breach of standards, or if the issue is significant and should still be investigated. Please do so within 20 working days of this reply.


Full details of how we handle complaints are available at http://www.bbc.co.uk/complaints/handle-complaint/.


How to contact the ECU:


We’ve provided a unique link for you in this email. This will open up further information about how to submit your complaint. You’ll be asked for the case reference number we’ve provided in this reply. Once you’ve used the link and submitted your complaint, the link will no longer work.


This is your link to contact the ECU if you wish: 


Click Here

 

Best wishes,


Sean Moss

Assistant Editor

News Editorial Standards

www.bbc.co.uk/complaints 


…………………………………….


To the Executive Complaints Unit (ECU)

23 November 2023


Ref: CAS-7679120-B1Y1G2-1


The BBC have reported, without any apparent challenge, both of Israel’s claims that Hamas killed 1400/1200 people on and around 7 October. 


Two initial questions arise here. Aren’t both these numbers too precisely rounded, and therefore  suspect? And why take Israel’s claims alone without corroborating evidence?


The more specific point of my enquiry concerns the people who were not killed by Hamas on and around 7 October. It’s about the people killed by Israeli forces. 


Strong, available evidence indicates that Israeli forces killed a significant number of Israelis on and around 7 October. 


That key information is not stated in the repeated BBC headline that “Hamas killed 1400/1200 people”. 


Further to my previous references, please see this well-informed article, drawing together all the main sources and evidence, to date.


https://electronicintifada.net/content/evidence-israel-killed-its-own-citizens-7-october/41156


Whatever one thinks about what happened on those days, the claim that Hamas alone killed 1400/1200 Israelis has not been verified, and therefore cannot be justified as a BBC headline/statement. 


The BBC has clearly been reproducing a crucial untruth in publishing and broadcasting this unverified claim. 


I have written in my previous correspondence with the BBC about the key implications of this in terms of fostering public perceptions of the 7 October events, and, most crucially, what Israel has gone on to do in Gaza. 


In all such senses the BBC has a responsibility to convey clear and accurate information. This headline claim is clear disinformation. 


I wish the ECU to consider why the BBC decided to use, and continues to use, the wording “Hamas killed 1400/1200 people”. 


I wish the ECU to consider my request that the BBC withdraw this headline/statement with immediate effect. 


I wish the ECU to consider my request that the BBC issue a prominent statement conceding their culpability in producing and repeating this misleading headline, and issue a properly informed replacement headline/statement.

Sunday, 19 November 2023

BBC headline claim on October 7 deaths is clear disinformation and a dangerous deception - Part 2

Further exchange with BBC

(Initial complaint here)


Friday, 17 November 2023


Reference CAS-7679120-B1Y1G2


Dear Mr Hilley


Thank you for contacting us about the BBC News website.


We note your concerns regarding our recent coverage of the current situation in the Middle East.


I can assure you that BBC News always aims for the highest standards of accuracy and impartiality when reporting, and we do aim to report accurate, impartial and comprehensive coverage likely to be of interest to our readers.


The bullet points within our live reporting pages aim to summarise some of the main aspects of our coverage - with more detailed information being provided across our articles:


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/topics/c2vdnvdg6xxt


BBC News has provided our global audiences with coverage and first-hand testimony of the atrocities committed by Hamas, and the suffering in Gaza. We have made clear the devastating human cost to civilians living in Israel and Gaza, and the unprecedented nature of what has happened. The huge loss of civilian life on both sides makes this a shocking and difficult story to cover. 


Our correspondents have been to the scenes of attacks, massacres and potential war crimes; and reported on the harrowing scenes they have witnessed. 


We have reported on the atrocities committed by Hamas in their assault on Israel and have heard many accounts from survivors of these attacks and family members of the victims, reflecting the trauma they are suffering. 


On the ground in Gaza our teams have reported on the rising death toll from Israeli air strikes and the unfolding humanitarian crisis, as first-hand testimony of the atrocities committed by Hamas, and the suffering in Gaza. water supplies are cut and thousands try to move out of the way of danger.


We have reflected statements from the UN and NGOs. We have interviewed representatives of the Israeli government, Hamas and UK government ministers and asked whether international law is being adhered to.


BBC News has also examined the history and complexities of the Israel-Palestinian conflict and analysed the potential consequences of the war for the wider region. Our reporting has included opinions from all sides, the region and the wider world. 


We have previously covered the escalation in tensions between Israel and the Palestinians, and the reasons for it.


Careful consideration has been given to all aspects of our coverage to ensure that we report on developments accurately and with due impartiality in line with the BBC Editorial Guidelines, which are publicly available.


We know that our audiences turn to us for clarity and to help them separate fact from fake. We know that trust is earned and we do not take that for granted. 


BBC News Chief Executive Deborah Turness has published a blog which addresses some of the concerns about our coverage: 


https://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/articles/2023/how-bbc-is-covering-israel-gaza


We do value your feedback about this. All complaints are sent to senior management and we’ve included your points in our overnight report. These reports are among the most widely read sources of feedback in the company and ensures that your concerns have been seen by the right people quickly. This helps inform their decisions about current and future content.


Many thanks again for getting in touch.


Kind regards,


Darren Loughlin 


BBC Complaints Team 

www.bbc.co.uk/complaints 


............................................


Sunday, 19 November 2023


Reference CAS-7679120-B1Y1G2


Dear Darren Loughlin 


Thank you for responding to my complaint, however belatedly. 


As expected, this is a typical piece of BBC obfuscation, littered with loaded and imbalanced language. 


You write:

“On the ground in Gaza our teams have reported on the rising death toll from Israeli air strikes and the unfolding humanitarian crisis, as first-hand testimony of the atrocities committed by Hamas, and the suffering in Gaza.”

Why is one simply “Israeli air strikes”, and the other “atrocities committed by Hamas”? Why not also use “atrocities” to describe what Israel has done in Gaza? Where is the equivalence of language? 


Why are the BBC still saying "Hamas killed 1200 people" (the now reduced figure) when there is strong and mounting evidence to contest this claim?


For example:

“It’s almost six weeks since Hamas went into Southern Israel and killed 1200 Israelis”. 

(Victoria Derbyshire, Newsnight, 16 November 2023.)

https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m001sh62/newsnight-tunnel-found-near-alshifa-hospital-israel-claims

Some other BBC captions now appear more circumspect: 

“Israel began striking Gaza after Hamas's 7 October attacks, in which 1,200 people were killed and more than 200 taken hostage” https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-middle-east-67423274

This appears to leave the question of the killing more 'open-ended', but still lacking any indication that Israeli forces were also responsible. 


And after over 6 weeks of slaughter in Gaza, any such amended wording comes far too late for helping to halt the killing spree which BBC statements like these have helped to drive.   


There is now clear evidence that Israeli forces killed an unspecified number of its own people during the 7 October events. 


This has been further confirmed in witness statements carried by Haaretz and other Israeli media.


Where are the BBC's own investigative reports on this?


Please see also:


https://x.com/aliabunimah/status/1725958732113162579?s=46&t=KuUo_VjYJYAxKcydnWm3EA


https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/israeli-helicopter-shot-civilians-7-october-rave-police-find


Do the BBC dispute this evidence? If so, please state why. If not, then they have a clear obligation to report such evidence, and to remove any false and misleading headlines or annotations.   


I need a full and open reply to my initial enquiry.  Having failed to address these substantive points, I wish to have my case elevated to a higher stage for further examination. 


Kind regards 

John Hilley 



Friday, 3 November 2023

BBC headline claim on October 7 deaths is clear disinformation and a dangerous deception

Text of complaint to the BBC (3 November 2023) about the deceptive use of its headline statement on the deaths within Israel on and around 7 October:


   

The BBC introduce and annotate every news report with the words:


“Israel began its operation after Hamas killed more than 1,400 people in Israel”.


(For example, 1 and 3 November 2023.)


Whatever one thinks about what happened on and around 7 October, this statement is false, a clear case of BBC disinformation. 


Whilst there is little doubt that Hamas and other resistance groups were responsible for a large proportion of deaths, there is strong evidence to suggest that Israeli forces were also responsible for substantive numbers of those killed. This must be accounted for. 


The entire account of how all these deaths occurred, showing all those involved, must be told as a matter of public information and historical record. 


Please consider the following as a key compendium of Israeli civilian and military witness statements and media references, undermining official Israeli claims and the repeated BBC headline that “Hamas [alone] killed more than 1400 people”. 


The BBC’s consistent use of this inaccurate statement avoids the full story behind these events, offering no serious understanding or clarity for those affected. 


Most disturbingly, the claim has been used to validate Israel’s illegal attack on Gaza, resulting in the killing of over 9,000 people, nearly half of them children, and displacement of an entire population, actions described by a leading UN figure as "a textbook case of genocide." 


In presenting this false picture about 7 October, the BBC has served to condition public support for Israel's mass killing and genocidal actions. Given the strong body of evidence now questioning Israel’s claims of sole Hamas responsibility, the BBC should withdraw this statement and issue a corrective explanation.

.............................................................


Further reading:


Max Blumenthal (Grayzone News): 'October 7 testimonies reveal Israel’s military ‘shelling’ Israeli citizens with tanks, missiles'


Jonathan Cook: What the BBC fails to tell you about October 7


Asa Winstanley: Watch the video about 7 October YouTube doesn’t want you to see 


Ali Abunimah and David Sheen: Israeli forces shot their own civilians, kibbutz survivor says


Robert Inlakesh and Sharmine Narwani (The Cradle): What really happened on 7th October?


Matt Kennard (tweet) on "textbook case of genocide."